Thanks for the response Martin.
I believe that short* would be more convenient then UTF-8 encoding. I must
admit that all of my Unicode coding experience is limited to Windows2000.
Here, almost all the functions that take Unicode characters are expecting a
short* buffer. And it also expects the most significant byte to be first in
the way you assumed.
VirusChecked by the Incepta Group plc
Snowball-discuss mailing list
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Sep 20 2007 - 12:02:40 BST