Re: [Snowball-discuss] Unicode support

From: Andreas Jung (andreas@andreas-jung.com)
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 01:43:00 BST


Do you speak about 16 bit fixed encoding? I only know USC-2 that
fulfills this requirement. Is it that what you mean?

Andreas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Porter" <martin_porter@softhome.net>
To: <andreas@andreas-jung.com>
Cc: "Andreas Jung" <andreas@andreas-jung.com>;
<snowball-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 13:02
Subject: Re: [Snowball-discuss] Unicode support

>
> Well, no, I guess the UTF-8 encoded strings would need to be expanded into
a
> 16 bit representation first.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> Snowball-discuss mailing list
> Snowball-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snowball-discuss
>

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Snowball-discuss mailing list
Snowball-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snowball-discuss



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Sep 20 2007 - 12:02:42 BST